范例5.2 原文

Dear Visa Officer ,

Even though my visa application was rejected twice by your officer , i do think that Ihave a strong case and would like to present my reasons to your honorable visa officersas why I should be granted a visitor's visa. I respectfully request that you listen to mystatement and give my application a reasonable re-evaluation:

l. It is not fair nor reasonable that the visa office rejected my application on the groundthat my husband's funding from the University of Waterloo has a mere $ l , 772dollars shortfall. The visa officer gave my husband a visa despite this shortfall butrejected mine because of the insufficient funds while an additional person costs onlyabout $2,000 dollars more money. If the visa officer believes that my husband cansupport himself for $l,772 dollars, the visa officer should also believe that myhusband and I can manage to support ourselves in a mere two thousand more dollarsbecause there is no substantial difference between ;$2,000 and $4,000 dollars.This is an amount of money that I can make easily in a matter of several months asan accountant in Beijing. People would spend their life savings and even everythingfor their family if necessary. Is spending several months salary a big deal to me ifthe money can bring me and my husband happily together? If the money is too bigand beyond the reasonable possibility of the earning power for a young professionalworking in Beijing , your rejection could be reasonable. However, denying myopportunity to see my husband just for a few thousand dollars is not a fair and soundjudgment .

2. In refusing my application ,the visa officer also wrote that I would be able to changemy status from within Canada ,thereby remaining employed while spouse completesstudies. This reason for rejection is even more unreasonable : What does the officermean that "subject would be able to change her status from within Canada"? Doesthe law stipulate that only those who are NOT ABLE to change status from withinCanada be granted a visa?

I am not familiar with Canadian laws, however, I am familiar with that that I am alaw abiding person and will be strictly observing the rules and regulations that myvisitor's status limits. Denying my visa is punishing me for a crime I did not and willnever commit.

3. Specialized in acoustics physical chemistry ,my husband has been in the business inmanufacturing hearing devices for the hearing handicapped people in China. Bydoing this, he has made a good name and good money. You may not know that themajor reason he selected the University of Waterloo is because that the Guelph-Water Center is the largest research center for his field in Canada. Returning withhis Ph. D. degree and more importantly with his advanced research in the hearing-aid technology, he will certainly make a fortune in the large Chinese market. If aperson's real career and big fortune is not the strong tie to his homeland, inaddition to his business contacts , social status and family connections , what elsecould be7 Given my husband's solid business ideas ,I believe that you will agree thatwe do have sufficient ties that will it "compel" our departure from Canada.Your re-evaluation and favorable consideration are greatly appreciated.